You had the idea on a walk. An AI turned your notes into verses, another one wrote the tune, and you threw out half of it and kept the line that made you laugh. So who wrote it?

That question used to be rare. Now it comes up every day, in homework, songs, reports and posts. Pretending AI wasn't involved is dishonest, and saying "the AI wrote it" usually isn't true either. You need a better answer than either of those, and you can work one out in a few minutes.

Watch: Who Wrote This Song?

Watch Who Wrote This Song? on YouTube. A human and AI duet about authorship, borrowing and consent.

This song is a duet between a human and AI. It argues about the same question this lesson asks: who gets the credit when everyone, human or machine, borrows from what came before, and who agreed to what. Listen once for enjoyment. Then listen again and note every line where one voice claims the work and the other pushes back.

Everything is borrowed, and that's fine

No one writes from nothing. Musicians learn other people's songs before they write their own, and every word you use was invented by someone else. The AI Consent Registry has fun with this, and its page Is Anything Original? makes the serious point underneath the joke. Originality lives in the choosing, combining and timing, not in starting from scratch.

So "did anyone else contribute?" is the wrong test, because someone always did. The useful questions are who did which part, and who decided what it was for.

Score two things: Craft and Intent

The AI Consent Registry judges every claim on two scales. They work just as well for your own work.

Who wrote it? Three steps to fair credit. 1. Craft: Who did the skilled making? 2. Intent: Who decided what it was for? 3. Credit: Write one short, true line. Everything is borrowed. Keep the receipts and say how it was made.

Craft is the skilled making. Who chose the words, built the melody, drew the picture, wrote the code, or fixed what was broken? Count the work that made it good, not just the work that made it exist.

Intent is the deciding. Who chose the subject, the audience and the point? Who said "no, not that" and "yes, keep that"? Who would be embarrassed if it went wrong?

Give each a rough split, such as mostly you, shared, or mostly the tools. Be honest. It's normal for AI to do a lot of the craft while you hold most of the intent. That isn't cheating. It's a new way of working, and it can make better things than either side would alone.

Write one honest credit line

Once you've scored it, say so in plain words. Something like:

  • "Idea and final edit by me. Drafting help from several AIs."
  • "My lyrics. Music generated with AI, and I picked from many versions."
  • "Written with AI as a sounding board. Every sentence checked and rewritten by me."

Keep it short and true. If a teacher, editor or client has their own rules, follow those first. A good credit line answers the question before anyone has to ask it.

Keep the receipts

Save your first notes, the prompts you used and the drafts you threw away. That trail backs up your credit line, shows what you learned, and settles arguments later. It's the same habit as making something worth sharing with AI.

Try it

Pick something you made recently with AI help. Score Craft and Intent, write one credit line, and show it to someone who saw you make it. If they'd change your scores, talk about why.

This lesson was written with help from several AIs. The idea, the choices and the final edit were human.